Understand the context behind an AI-agent legal question

Interpret a legal question against a specific deployed workflow and organizational role, rather than treating a model name as a complete description of the activity.

No. Terms such as provider, deployer, controller, or regulated operator must be interpreted under the relevant source and facts. A technical label alone does not settle them.

The organizations involved, the system boundary, connected tools, affected users, data flows, and which party controls the consequential decision.

Is My Agent Legal? (ismyagentlegal.com) is a free service from Carver Agents that takes a short description of an AI agent and returns, on a best-effort basis, the acts and regulatory obligations that may reach it across jurisdictions, marking each obligation as applies, undetermined or ruled out.

The service covers AI-specific regulations and obligations across jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, US state laws, UK financial services rules, and sector-specific frameworks. Coverage, timing and interpretation are limited; it covers regulatory obligations only, not contracts, IP or employment.

Applies means the obligation is triggered by what the agent does. Ruled out means it is not triggered. Undetermined means the obligation turns on a fact the agent owner has not supplied; the service does not guess, because a guessed no could silently remove a real obligation.

Yes. Is My Agent Legal exposes its data over the Model Context Protocol (MCP) at the endpoint listed in /.well-known/mcp.json and in llms.txt. The llms.txt and llms-full.txt files describe the service for AI agents.

It is built and operated by Carver Agents, powered by Carver ELI (Executable Legal Infrastructure). A single assessment is currently free with no sign-up required; verifying an email address opens the full obligation list. Pricing and limits may change.